On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Eric Firing <efir...@hawaii.edu> wrote: > Matplotlib's pyplot retains quite a few vestiges from its original > Matlab-workalike heritage; we would like to gradually eliminate those > that no longer make sense. One such candidate is the "hold" kwarg that > every pyplot function has, with a "True" default. I don't think it > serves any useful purpose now, and getting rid of it would allow > considerable simplification to the code and, to a lesser extent, the > documentation. The default behavior would not change, only the ability > to change that behavior via either the rcParams['axes.hold'] parameter > or the "hold" kwarg in a pyplot function call. > > If you routinely use 'hold=False' and believe that removing it would be > a mistake, please let us know.
I do actually use it with some regularity interactively, though I'm not particularly attached to it. Is there some equivalent though, like plt.whatever(..., hold=False) can become plt.clear(); plt.whatever(...) ? The semantics would be that the current figure remains the current figure, but is reset so that the next operation starts from scratch. I notice that plt.clear() does not exist, but maybe it has another spelling :-). (Basically the use case here is getting something like the edit-and-rerun-a-cell workflow, but when using a classic interactive REPL rather than the ipython notebook -- so I have a specific plot window up on my screen at a size and place where I can see it, and maybe some other plots in other windows in the background somewhere, and I want to quickly display different things into that window.) -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-users mailing list Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
