Hi everyone,

I know it´s more a general question, but regarding the following conversation from the archive, which results are correct?
The (Qf - Q)t or the ones obtained from the get_losses.m file?
I would have done it the same way as mohsen, just with the absolute values, but now i´m somewhat unsure.

thank you
Simon


============================================================

Ray Zimmerman
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:45:38 -0400

If I recall correctly, MATPOWER reports the reactive losses in the series
portion of the transmission line not including the line charging elements. As
you noticed, including the line charging elements often makes the total
reactive power "loss" for a line negative.

--
Ray Zimmerman
Senior Research Associate
211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
phone: (607) 255-9645



On Aug 26, 2010, at 9:06 AM, mohsen rahmani wrote:

 Dear all

 I already implemented a power flow with Newton method. all my results are
 equal to matpower except reactive power losses.

 we can  use various formulation for calculating reactive power losses the
 simple one is:
 Q(from-to)+Q(to-from)=Q(losses) but this formulation is not satisfied in
 matpower results. what is the problem? for example  for IEEE 30 bus system:

     Branch Data                                                              |
 
================================================================================
 Brnch   From   To      From Bus Injection        To Bus Injection
 Loss (I^2 * Z)
   #         Bus    Bus    P (MW)   Q (MVAr)   P (MW)   Q (MVAr)   P (MW)   Q
 (MVAr)
 -----  -----  -----  --------  --------  --------  --------  --------
 --------
    1           1       2         10.89     -5.09             -10.86
 2.17          0.026        0.08
    2           1       3         15.08      4.09              -14.96
 -5.57         0.127       0.48
 in branch 1-2   the losses sholud be   (-5.09)+(2.17  )=  -2.92
 in branch 1-3   the losses should be   (4.09 )+(-5.57 )=-1.46

 which are different from matpower results.

 thanks for your help
 Best Regards
  Mohsen Rahmani



Reply via email to