Dear Dr. Ray, Thank you for your kind reply. I saw some paper that they consider power system characteristics for participation factor also. I would be please if you announce for new version of Matpower when it implemente. Yours Faithfully
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Ray Bo <[email protected]> wrote: > Mehran, > > You are correct. In current implementation, load variation is allowed at > only one bus, and it is compensated by slack bus generator. > > It is being implemented to support load variations at multiple buses, in > which case all generators or selected generators will need to respond to > the variations. Then the question comes to defining the participation > factor of each generator. It could be proportional to their Pmax, or, to > the base case dispatch, or in any user defined way. > > > > Rui (Ray) Bo, Ph.D, SMIEEE > > Regulatory and Economic Studies Department > > Midwest ISO > > 1125 Energy Park Drive > > St.Paul, MN 55108 > > Phone: (651) 632-8447 > > Email: > [email protected]<https://webmail.midwestiso.org/Owa/redir.aspx?C=e7e0f592baec44b89fe2b6b319bff0bf&URL=mailto%3arbo%40misoenergy.org> > , > [email protected]<https://webmail.midwestiso.org/Owa/redir.aspx?C=e7e0f592baec44b89fe2b6b319bff0bf&URL=mailto%3arui.bo%40ieee.org> > > *From:* Mehran Khosravi <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 06:54 > *To:* MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected]> > *Subject:* CPF algorithm > > Dear discission group, > I tried to chekc the generators output and PV bus real power in CPF. > Please correct me if I did mistake ( in CPF all generators must response to > the load increment but in the Matpower just slack bus do increment the > output and other generators stay in the schedule output ) I would be > pleased if you reply me that whether am I right or no. > Best Regards > > -- > *Mehran Khosravi fard* > > -- *Mehran Khosravi fard*
