The problem is infeasible. Try relaxing the flow constraint and you'll see that 
it becomes feasible. As you decrease the flow constraint, generation begins to 
shift from generator 1 to generator 2. Somewhere between a flow limit of 54 and 
53 MW, generator 2 reaches it's upper limit of 10MW, beyond which the problem 
becomes infeasible.

Just because all of the other lines have plenty of capacity, does not mean that 
the system can be dispatched in a way that the power will flow along the paths 
you would like. Remember, the flows follow Kirchhoff's laws, even no matter 
where the available line capacity is.

-- 
Ray Zimmerman
Senior Research Associate
419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
phone: (607) 255-9645




On Nov 23, 2012, at 3:37 AM, Willi David <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I'm trying to run an AC OPF for the following small and simple case 
> (consisting of 5 buses, 2 generators and 5 branches) which includes a limit 
> for the active power flow of 10 MW for the branch connecting bus 1 and bus 2.
> 
> ---
> function mpc = Mycase
> 
> %% MATPOWER Case Format : Version 2
> mpc.version = '2';
> 
> %%-----  Power Flow Data  -----%%
> %% system MVA base
> mpc.baseMVA = 100;
> 
> %% bus data
> %    bus_i    type    Pd    Qd    Gs    Bs    area    Vm    Va    baseKV    
> zone    Vmax    Vmin
> mpc.bus = [
>    1    3    0    0    0    0    1    1    0    345    1    1.1    0.9;
>    2    1    25    5    0    0    1    1    0    345    1    1.1    0.9;
>    3    1    50    12.5    0    0    1    1    0    345    1    1.1    0.9;
>    4    1    50    10    0    0    1    1    0    345    1    1.1    0.9;
>    5    2    0    0    0    0    1    1    0    345    1    1.1    0.9;
> ];
> 
> %% generator data
> %    bus    Pg    Qg    Qmax    Qmin    Vg    mBase    status    Pmax    Pmin 
>    Pc1    Pc2    Qc1min    Qc1max    Qc2min    Qc2max    ramp_agc    ramp_10  
>   ramp_30    ramp_q    apf
> mpc.gen = [
>    1    0    0    300    -300    1    100    1    200    0    0    0    0    
> 0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0;
>    5    0    0    300    -300    1    100    1    10    0    0    0    0    0 
>    0    0    0    0    0    0    0;
> ];
> 
> %% branch data
> %    fbus    tbus    r    x    b    rateA    rateB    rateC    ratio    angle 
>    status    angmin    angmax
> mpc.branch = [
>    1    2    0.001    0.01    0.1    10    10    10    0    0    1    -360    
> 360;
>    2    3    0.001    0.01    0.1    500    500    500    0    0    1    -360 
>    360;
>    3    4    0.001    0.01    0.1    500    500    500    0    0    1    -360 
>    360;
>    4    5    0.001    0.01    0.1    500    500    500    0    0    1    -360 
>    360;
>    4    1    0.001    0.01    0.1    500    500    500    0    0    1    -360 
>    360;
> ];
> 
> %% generator cost data
> %    1    startup    shutdown    n    x1    y1    ...    xn    yn
> %    2    startup    shutdown    n    c(n-1)    ...    c0
> mpc.gencost = [
>    2    0    0    3    0    4.5    0;
>    2    0    0    3    0    5.5    0;
> ];
> 
> opt = mpoption('OPF_FLOW_LIM', 1);
> runopf('Mycase', opt);
> ---
> 
> The limit for the active power flow for the branch connecting bus 1 and bus 2 
> is set deliberately low. My problem is that the case does not converge. 
> However, I do not think that the case is infeasible. The power demanded at 
> bus 2 & 3 could be rerouted over bus 4 where there is enough branch flow 
> capacity available. As AC OPF alogorithm I'm using MIPS, but I have also 
> tried fmincon with the same result that the case does not converge.
> 
> Can anybody tell me what I'm doing wrong?
> Many thanks for your replies/comments.
> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to