I also was going to suggest that you use runduopf().

-- 
Ray Zimmerman
Senior Research Associate
419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
phone: (607) 255-9645




On Apr 23, 2013, at 2:53 PM, angelina sirri <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Dr Zimmerman,
> I decided that, for the hours that the load exceeds the minimum generation I 
> will run a dupf.I tried it and it works fine. I was confused, because case 
> 24ieee is a matpower case, so I had thought that it should work correctly if 
> I don't do any modifications.But  do a yearly simulation is an extention of 
> the fixed peak load that there is in mpc.bus(:,2).
> Anyway! Please correct me if I am saying something wrong.
> Thanks for your time and help!
> Regards,
> Angelina
> 
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: negative generation on opf
> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:54:09 +0300
> 
> Dear Dr Zimmerman,
> Thanks a lot for your help.
> I ran a dc opf for case 24ieee without considering any faults, for the whole 
> year, in which the load in the buses  is  the one determined from ieee 
> reliability test system with annual system peak 2850 MW and annual system min 
> 965MW. For the hours that don't converge, I checked the sum of the load for 
> all the buses  and the PMIN  and PMAX and I saw indeed what you said.
> For the times that the dcopf does not converge the  sum of pmin for the 
> online generators is greater than the sum of the load for that hour.So the dc 
> opf does not converge for all the hours that the load is lower that 1040 MW, 
> which is the sum of Pmin for all the generators.
> I am a bit confused!How I can solve that problem?Can I make the assumption 
> that the dcopf is a success for those cases?How can I control the generators 
> , in order to have some of them shut down for those cases?
> Thanks for your time.
> Regards,
> Angelina
> 
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: negative generation on opf
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:31:09 -0400
> To: [email protected]
> 
> When the OPF does not converge, the result is often meaningless. Finding the 
> reason for unfeasibility can be a non-trivial task. Start by checking that 
> total fixed load lies between the sum of PMIN and the sum of PMAX for the 
> on-line generators. Try removing all of the line flow limits. Try a simple 
> power flow with what you think are reasonable voltage and real power set 
> points for the generators.
> 
> Once you find a feasible OPF solution you may be able to modify parameters 
> gradually toward the infeasible case to determine which constraints bind and 
> then conflict.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ray Zimmerman
> Senior Research Associate
> 419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
> phone: (607) 255-9645
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 22, 2013, at 2:19 PM, angelina sirri <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Dr Zimmerman,
> I am doing reliability study in case24_ieee_rts and I have put extra 
> expensive generators in load buses, in order to calculate the load 
> curtailment.I did acopf but for some hours opf did not converged and I saw 
> that the Qmin and max limits were violated.I couldn't find why, So I tried to 
> do dcopf and now, it does not converges again and I see that the extra 
> generators that I have put, some hours generate negative power of small value 
> (like -0,0025).Have you got any idea why is this happening or what should I 
> check??
> 
> Regards,
> Angelina
> 
> 

Reply via email to