Thank you Prof. Zimmerman. Your explanations helped me. However, I still
have another thing that is a little bit unclear.
I have some transformer parameters (in Ohms and Siemes) calculated using
the "to" side voltage. How do I convert them to p.u.? Do I use the same
Zbase that you suggested?

Thank you for your help!

Petre


2013/5/13 Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]>

> Since the branch impedances are on the "to" side of the branch, you are
> correct that you would use the voltage base from the "to" bus.
>
> The formula isn't really a MATPOWER question, so you should be able to
> find the answer in a good power systems textbook, however it is very
> straightforward to derive yourself. Essentially we want to find the
> impedance base (Zbase) in terms of the power and voltage bases (Sbase and
> Vbase).
>
> Start with some definitions ...
>
> (1)  V = Vpu * Vbase
> (2)  S = Spu * Sbase
> (3)  Z = Zpu * Zbase
>
> Then some simple relationships ...
>
> (4)  V = I * Z
> (5)  S = V * conj(I)
>
> Solving (4) for I and substituting in (5), then solving for Z, gives ...
>
> (6) Z = |V|^2 / conj(S)
>
> And we know the p.u. quantities have the same relationships …
>
> (7) Zpu = |Vpu|^2 / conj(Spu)
>
> Substituting (1)-(3) and then (7) into (6) and rearranging, gives …
>
> Zbase = Vbase^2 / Sable
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> --
> Ray Zimmerman
> Senior Research Associate
> 419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
> phone: (607) 255-9645
>
>
>
>
> On May 13, 2013, at 3:44 AM, Petre Razusi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have some things I don't quite understand regarding the modeling of
> branches and the pu system.
> > If I'm not wrong, to transform the R,X and B parameters to pu one needs
> a base impedance. Since the model used for the branch is a complex one,
> dealing with both transformers and lines, I presume that this impedance is
> calculated using the "to" bus voltage. Am I right? And if so, could you
> tell me what is the formula used to compute the base impedance?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Petre
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to