Yes, you're correct. I was confused how idx_gen.m worked and made a bad assumption. Thank you for clarifying.
Trevor From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Zimmerman Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 12:48 PM To: MATPOWER discussion forum Subject: Re: mpc.gen columns Are you mixing MATPOWER versions? Some of these columns changed in version 3.2 of MATPOWER (I think) ... which is one reason it's always good to use the names, not the numeric column indexes in your code. I do not see any inconsistencies between idx_gen.m and the manual for version 4.1. -- Ray Zimmerman Senior Research Associate B30 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 phone: (607) 255-9645 On Jul 12, 2013, at 11:11 AM, "Hardy, Trevor" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: There seems to be a discrepancy in the labels assigned to the columns of the mpc.gen matrix. Page 78 of the manual lists columns 11 and 12 as PC1 and PC2 while the idx_gen that defines the labels for the mpc.gen columns (found in many files, printpf being the one I'm looking at) shows columns 11 and 12 defined as MU_PMAX, MU_PMIN. It appears that all the columns following PMIN (column 10) have different orders depending on the document being examined. Can you clarify which is correct? Trevor
