Hi, 

Please send me MATPOWER coding to find Locational Marginal Pricing using DC OPF 
in a 3 bus system.

P B Suresh Babu
ME Student Anna University
Chennai India
Working as 
Assistant Director (Electrical)
MSME Testing Centre, Chennai.
Under Ministry of MSME, Government of India


________________________________
 From: Haneen Mohammad dawoud Aburub <[email protected]>
To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected]> 
Cc: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, 19 September 2013 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: Question about locational marginal prices
 


Thank you so much for tthe help. I think the problem is because I am using 
lossless DCOPF and the change in my hourly load profile is not that much, so 
the sensitivity of LMP to laod change will be zero.  I replaced (rundcopf) by 
(runopf) to perform ACOPF. Also, I changed (OPF_ALG_DC) to (OPF_ALG), but I got 
the following error: 

??? Error using ==> makeAvl at 73
makeAvl: either Qmin or Qmax must be equal to zero for each dispatchable load.
Error in ==> opf_setup at 172
[Avl, lvl, uvl] = makeAvl(baseMVA, gen);
Error in ==> opf at 219
om = opf_setup(mpc, mpopt);
Error in ==> runopf at 96
[r, success] = opf(casedata, mpopt);
Error in ==> run_3bus at 120
results = runopf(mpc, opt);
What this error means? What should I do else to have a correct ACOPF?
 
Thanks again, appreciate your help.

----- Original Message -----
From: sarab singh <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:42 pm
Subject: Re: Question about locational marginal prices
To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected]>

> It may happens when the network is not in congestion.
> 

> 

> 


________________________________
 > From: Haneen Mohammad dawoud Aburub <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Monday, 16 September 2013 10:54 PM
> Subject: Question about locational marginal prices

> 

> Hi,
>  
> I used the DCOPF to get the locational marginal prices of a 3-bust system. 
> The locational marginal prices that I have got are not changing with the 
> change in load. Can you please tell me the reason of that.
>  
> Thank you.> 
> 

Reply via email to