Thank you Ray!

I found a mistake (a forgotten editing) in the case file that was leading
to failure of DC OPF.

--

PhD Student, Freelancer

Energy Department

Complex Energy Systems



AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH

Giefinggasse 2, 1210 Vienna

Austria M +43  06507205370 [email protected]  |  http://www.ait.ac.at


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not sure why, but it appears that the OPF is probably not converging
> successfully. Did you check results.success to see that it converged? I
> am not able to reproduce your result. When I execute the 3 lines of code
> you have below, I get:
>
>
> ================================================================================
> |     Reserves
>     |
>
> ================================================================================
>  Gen   Bus   Status  Reserves   Price
>   #     #              (MW)     ($/MW)     Included in Zones ...
> ----  -----  ------  --------  --------   ------------------------
>   1      1      1      25.00      2.00     1
>   2      2      1      15.00      2.00     1
>   3     22      1       0.00      2.00     1
>   4     27      1       0.00      2.00     1
>   5     23      1      19.39      5.50     1, 2
>   6     13      1       0.61      5.50     1, 2
>                      --------
>             Total:     60.00              Total Cost: $177.81
>
> Zone  Reserves   Price
>   #     (MW)     ($/MW)
> ----  --------  --------
>   1     60.00      2.00
>   2     20.00      3.50
>
>
> ================================================================================
> |     Reserve Limits
>     |
>
> ================================================================================
>  Gen   Bus   Status  Rmin mu     Rmin    Reserves    Rmax    Rmax mu
> Pmax mu
>   #     #             ($/MW)     (MW)      (MW)      (MW)     ($/MW)
> ($/MW)
> ----  -----  ------  --------  --------  --------  --------  --------
> --------
>   1      1      1        -        0.00     25.00     25.00      0.10
> 0.00
>   2      2      1        -        0.00     15.00     25.00       -
> 0.00
>   3     22      1       1.00      0.00      0.00     25.00       -
> -
>   4     27      1       2.00      0.00      0.00     25.00       -
> 0.00
>   5     23      1        -        0.00     19.39     25.00      0.00
> 0.50
>   6     13      1       0.00      0.00      0.61     25.00       -
> -
>                                          --------
>                                 Total:     60.00
>
> ... which looks like a correct result.
>
> --
> Ray Zimmerman
> Senior Research Associate
> B30 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853  USA
> phone: (607) 255-9645
>
>
> On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Sohail Khan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have two questions:
>
> *Question 1*
> While running the OPF extension of the fixed zonal reserves extension of
> OPF in the default settings that is simulating following code
>
> mpc = loadcase('t_case30_userfcns');
> mpc = toggle_reserves(mpc, 'on');
> results = runopf(mpc);
>
> leading to the result:
> Zone  Reserves   Price
>   #     (MW)     ($/MW)
> ----  --------  --------
>   1     49.7353975328242405556000.00
>   2     16.58     36.71
>
> But the zonal requirement is:
> %% reserve requirements for each zone in MW
> mpc.reserves.req   = [60; 20];
>
> Then according to equation 6.5 of the manual the additional constraint
> 'Rreq' should be satisfied but it is not as shown above. Even while
> decrease the zone requirements to
> mpc.reserves.req   = [10; 10]; the result does not satisfy the constraint
>
> Zone  Reserves   Price
>   #     (MW)     ($/MW)
> ----  --------  --------
>   1     19.12     13.25
>   2      7.842960557094756162200000.00
>
> Why is it so?
>
> *Question 2*
> My second question is that while the reserve cost is different for
> different generators
> mpc.reserves.cost  = [    1.9;    2;    3;    4;    5;    5.5    ];
>
> the reserve distribution among generators doesn't reflect the difference
> in the amount of reserve power assigned such that reserves allocated per
> generator 8.29 MW.
>
> Why is it the same?
>
> Please guide me.
>
> Thank you!
> Sohail Khan
>
>
>

Reply via email to