Hi Dr Zimmerman, Thank you, it was my mistake. Apologies.
Regards Tom On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: > There’s always the possibility of a bug, but I’d be a bit surprised in > this case. Unless you have additional user-defined costs, you can easily > compute the objective function value yourself using the totcost() > function, or even by explicitly using the quadratic coefficients to compute > the cost of each gen. > > -- > Ray Zimmerman > Senior Research Associate > B30 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA > phone: (607) 255-9645 > > On Aug 1, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Tommy k <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > I have the some cost functions of the following format which I believe is > still a *convex* cost function. With large initial cost and a negative > 1st > order coefficient. > > abc.gencost = [ > 2 0 0 3 0.54376 -229.78 145993.63; > .... > ] > > runopf converges and I am getting lambda's in the correct ranges. However > the object function is displaying a very, very large number. Could there > be a bug in the display of the objective function? > > Regards > Tom > > >
