Also, I would suggest using the scale_load() function to modify the load from hour to hour, rather than manipulating columns in bus and gen directly. It can handle both fixed loads and the nominal values of dispatchable loads.
And just a clarification, dispatchable loads (implemented as negative generators, see section 6.4.2 in the User’s Manual <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/manual.pdf>) are only required if you want the load to be price dependent. Ray > On Jan 21, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Carlos Cruzat Hermosilla <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Shri > > The load is not fixed, so I guess I will use the negative generator units. > > Thanks! > Carlos > > 2015-01-21 12:51 GMT+00:00 Abhyankar, Shrirang G. <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > If the load is fixed for each hour the what you are doing is fine. If the > load is dispatchable, then use negative generator units. > > Shri > > On Jan 21, 2015, at 6:21 AM, "Carlos Cruzat Hermosilla" <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi All > > > > I am currently working with the case24_ieee_rts.m and I am trying to > > implement the load profile per hour from the same system, i.e. load data > > obtained from RTS-1996. > > > > I am using the commands attached in order to implement the load, where > > Pload_Hour and Qload_Hour are the previous calculation done to obtained the > > load profile per hour. > > > > However I was told that there is a better way to modify the loads by > > incorporating the load profile as a negative generator units? So could > > anybody confirm if this way of changing the load profile (per hour) it is > > correct? > > > > Thanks, > > Carlos > > > > for uu=1:8760 > > for ss=1:24 > > celll{uu,1}.bus(ss,3)=Pload_Hour(uu,ss); %Active Power > > celll{uu,1}.bus(ss,4)=Qload_Hour(uu,ss); %Reactive Power > > end > > end > > >
