Yes I noticed that and I executed it after fixing that. I still got those errors.
Waqas ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Abhyankar, Shrirang G. [[email protected]] Sent: 14 August 2015 22:07 To: MATPOWER discussion forum Subject: Re: PF Convergance There is a typo in MATPOWER Faq # 5 mpc.bus(:, PD) = 0; mpc.bus(:, QD) = 0; mpc.gen(:, PG) = 0; should be mpcbase.bus(:, PD) = 0; mpcbase.bus(:, QD) = 0; mpcbase.gen(:, PG) = 0; Shri From: <Syed>, Waqas Ahmad Raazi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, August 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: PF Convergance Hi everyone, So, I was having trouble with PF convergance and then I looked into Faq#5 Why does MATPOWER power flow not converge?<http://www.pserc.cornell.edu//matpower/#pfconvergence> Now in that FAQ, I am having trouble with point number 5. When I try to run the CPF from 0 load and generation to the target case, I get following errors and warnings: step 1 : lambda = NaN, corrector did not converge in 10 iterations NaN's cannot be converted to logicals. Error in printpf (line 175) nzld = find((bus(:, PD) | bus(:, QD)) & bus(:, BUS_TYPE) ~= NONE); Error in runcpf (line 392) printpf(results, 1, mpopt); Error in Wildpoldsried_Extraction (line 236) results = runcpf(mpcbase, mpctarget); Warnings: Warning: Matrix is singular to working precision. > In newtonpf at 89 In runcpf at 203 In Wildpoldsried_Extraction at 236 Warning: Matrix is singular to working precision. > In cpf_predictor at 71 In runcpf at 249 In Wildpoldsried_Extraction at 236 Kindly let me know if you guys have any idea on how to address these issues. Kind Regards, Waqas
