sir say something about my question that was how to connect SVC in the ckt?


On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:55 PM, anshu dahiya <[email protected]>
wrote:

> sir, how to connect SVC in the ckt with the matpower?
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:27 AM, anshu dahiya <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> sir how connect voltage regulator in matpower. is it connected in branch
>> data or in generator data?
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> mpopt = mpoption('linprog.Algorithm', 'dual-simplex');
>>>
>>> Btw, please confirm all of the things I requested before asking any more
>>> questions about this topic.
>>>
>>>    Ray
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2016, at 2:53 AM, anshu dahiya <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> sir i have tried very much to change solver  but i couldn't understand
>>> how to change solver in matpower.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So can you confirm each of the follow?
>>>> - You say that the AC OPF converges but the DC OPF claims
>>>> infeasibility, correct?
>>>> - You’ve checked the system data … case_info() output looks good (no
>>>> islands, 1 reference bus, generation range adequate to serve total load,
>>>> etc.).
>>>> - Removing line limits (by setting RATE_A to 0) does not make that
>>>> problem feasible?
>>>> - You are using the Optimization Toolbox default solver (linprog or
>>>> quadprog with interior point solver).
>>>>
>>>> If so, can you try with a simplex solver (dual simplex is probably
>>>> best) and see if that gives a different result?
>>>>
>>>>   Ray
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 30, 2016, at 1:31 AM, anshu dahiya <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> sir i have already relaxed my line limits. but it doesn't give any
>>>> response!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It appears that your solver thinks the problem is infeasible. Try
>>>>> relaxing the branch flow limits to see if it solves. e.g.
>>>>>
>>>>> define_constants;
>>>>> mpc = loadcase(<your case file>);
>>>>> mpc.branch(:, RATE_A) = mpc.branch(:, RATE_A) * 2; % double the flow
>>>>> limits
>>>>> r = rundcopf(mpc);
>>>>>
>>>>> Or instead of doubling the limits, you could temporarily eliminate
>>>>> them completely.
>>>>>
>>>>> mpc.branch(:, RATE_A) = 0; % eliminates line flow limits completely
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Ray
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 29, 2016, at 5:19 AM, anshu dahiya <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> sir  my acopf is running but not the dcopf what may be cause? The
>>>>> error comes in the matpower is as below:
>>>>> rundcopf(n84)
>>>>>
>>>>> MATPOWER Version 5.1, 20-Mar-2015 -- DC Optimal Power Flow
>>>>> The interior-point algorithm uses a built-in starting point;
>>>>> ignoring user-supplied X0.
>>>>> Exiting: One or more of the residuals, duality gap, or total relative
>>>>> error
>>>>>  has grown 100000 times greater than its minimum value so far:
>>>>>          the primal appears to be infeasible (and the dual unbounded).
>>>>>          (The dual residual < TolFun=1.00e-08.)
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>  Did NOT converge (0.06 seconds)  <<<<<
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Saranya A <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Anshu,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even I faced a similar problem with a different system. In
>>>>>>  "mpc.branch" the 6th, 7th and 8th columns represent RATE A - MVA rating 
>>>>>> A
>>>>>> (long term rating) ,RATE B - MVA rating B (short term rating), RATE C - 
>>>>>> MVA
>>>>>> rating C (emergency rating) respectively. Try giving a high MVA rating to
>>>>>> all the 3 columns and check if your solution converges.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Saranya.A
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:08 PM, anshu dahiya <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i have double check my data it is giving the below error:
>>>>>>> *runopf(c84)*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *MATPOWER Version 5.1, 20-Mar-2015 -- AC Optimal Power Flow*
>>>>>>> *MATLAB Interior Point Solver -- MIPS, Version 1.2, 20-Mar-2015*
>>>>>>> * (using built-in linear solver)*
>>>>>>> *Numerically Failed*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Did not converge in 6 iterations.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *>>>>>  Did NOT converge (0.09 seconds)  <<<<<*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Fiaz Ahmad <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If there is no syntax error then check your branch matrix. It has
>>>>>>>> high R and X values,it will not converge. Probably you are not using 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> correct per unit values. Your zbase=vbase*vbase/mvabase. Use zbase to 
>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>> p.u values for R and X.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hope it helps
>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2016 8:53 AM, "anshu dahiya" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sir my system is not converging while performing opf and dcopf ,
>>>>>>>> what should i  check in my program. Plz help me
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 5:53 AM, anshu dahiya <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the problem is still as it was. my 84 bus system is still not
>>>>>>>>> converging after applying all steps directed by the Dr. Ray Zimmerman 
>>>>>>>>> . can
>>>>>>>>> anyone help me to make the system converge. i am attaching my file
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See FAQ #5 <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/#pfconvergence>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    Ray
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 3:42 AM, anshu dahiya <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> my 84 bus system is not converging into 10 iteration. what should
>>>>>>>>>> i take steps to make it converge.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Whenever you have a problem with a case file, the first thing to
>>>>>>>>>>> do is always run case_info()
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/ref/matpower6.0b1/case_info.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>  to
>>>>>>>>>>> check for errors in the connectivity information …
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> case_info('casem84')
>>>>>>>>>>> Bad bus numbers:              1
>>>>>>>>>>>            bus(1, BUS_I) = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Turns out that bus numbers must be positive integers, as stated
>>>>>>>>>>> in caseformat
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/ref/matpower6.0b1/caseformat.html>
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     Ray
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 1:59 AM, anshu dahiya <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sir how to solve the following error in matpower which comes in
>>>>>>>>>>> the case84 which i have attached
>>>>>>>>>>> Error using sparse
>>>>>>>>>>> Index into matrix must be positive.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Error in ext2int (line 141)
>>>>>>>>>>>             n2i = sparse(mpc.bus(:, BUS_I), ones(nb, 1), 1:nb,
>>>>>>>>>>> max(mpc.bus(:, BUS_I)), 1);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Error in runpf (line 111)
>>>>>>>>>>> mpc = ext2int(mpc);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming this is for a power flow problem, you still have to
>>>>>>>>>>>> decide whether the bus is voltage controlled or not. If so, make 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it a PV
>>>>>>>>>>>> bus. If not, and the DG simply injects a fixed amount of power 
>>>>>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>>> controlling voltage, then make it a PQ bus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Ray
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Jun 22, 2016, at 1:27 AM, anshu dahiya <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > how to nominate DG bus which has load as well as generation
>>>>>>>>>>>> > the nomenclature in the matpower as below
>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1= PQ bus
>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2= PV bus
>>>>>>>>>>>> > 3= reference bus
>>>>>>>>>>>> > 4= isolated bus
>>>>>>>>>>>> > i have attached my file plz take a look of it. suggest me
>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>> > <casem84.m>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <casem84.m>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to