Sorry, no development on the ZIP model recently. It still applies the same 
fractions to all loads.

   Ray


> On Jul 30, 2018, at 3:15 PM, Abhyankar, Shrirang G. <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I do not know much about the TCSC modeling so you’ll need to decide what type 
> of model suits your needs. By default, the continuation power flow assumes 
> the loads are modeled as constant power injections. It also supports ZIP 
> loads through the options ‘exp.sys_wide_zip_loads.pw’ and 
> ‘exp.sys_wide_zip_loads.qw’ (see mpoption) which one can use to model 
> constant current and constant impedance loads. Coming back to your question: 
> you can either use reactance or power injection model with CPF. One catch 
> with the ZIP model, however, is that all loads are converted with the given 
> ZIP fractions. You cannot have different ZIP fractions at different buses. I 
> am not sure if there has been any development on this front in the recent 
> past.  
>  
> Shri
> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Ahmad Sadiq 
> Abubakar <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, July 30, 2018 at 1:44 PM
> To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: CPF with TCSC models
>  
> Thanks Shri.
>  
> I guess the constant power model will be adequate with CPF right?
>  
> I am using CPF to compute maximum loadability and determine TCSC location and 
> size for enhancement of this loadability.
>  
> So question is which of this model will be adequate for my study?
>  
>  
> In anticipation of your response.
> Ahmad, A. S.
>  
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 6:09 PM Abhyankar, Shrirang G. <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> No, the power flow solution will be different for the below two cases as (1) 
>> behaves like a constant impedance model, while (2) is constant power model.
>>  
>> Shri
>>  
>> From: <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Ahmad 
>> Sadiq Abubakar <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Date: Monday, July 30, 2018 at 9:06 AM
>> To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject: CPF with TCSC models
>>  
>> Hi all,
>>  
>> I model TCSC using matpower by two approaches
>> (1) Variable reactance model or
>> (2) Power injection model.
>>  
>> In steady state analysis (load flow or CPF), will these two models be 
>> equivalent ? especially in CPF.
>> Equivalent i mean load flow results: voltage magmitude, angle and line power 
>> flows.
>>  
>> I kindly request for guidance/answers.
>>  
>> In anticipation of your responses.
>>  
>>  

Reply via email to