Dear Dr. Ray Zimmerman, Thanks for your kind response. It also worked for me too.
*Regards,Aamir Nawaz* On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 5:17 AM Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I should have mentioned that the MIPS solver in MATPOWER is > essentially a Matlab language implementation of the MEX based PDIPM. > > Ray > > > On Jul 26, 2019, at 4:14 PM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: > > The particular reason a specific numerical algorithm fails for a given > problem is not always easy to determine. > > On this problem, you can try turning on the mips.step_control option. > That seems to work for me. > > Ray > > > On Jul 18, 2019, at 10:59 AM, Aamir Nawaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Researchers, > > I have tried to execute the following and error comes. Can anyone explain > why algorithm like PDIPM fails to solve this large system? However, i have > solved it using evolutionary algorithm and it is converged. Is there any > limit of number of dimensions for PDIPM or others? If no, then suggest me > how i can solve it or suggest any other algorithm like SDPOPF etc. I > waiting for your kind reply. > > runopf(case13659pegase) > MATPOWER Version 6.0, 16-Dec-2016 -- AC Optimal Power Flow > PDIPMOPF Version 4.1, Build 18, 11-Nov-2011 > Copyright (c) 2007-2011 by Power System Engineering Research Center (PSERC) > > >>>>> Did NOT converge (4.42 seconds) <<<<< > > -- > > > > *Regards,Aamir Nawaz.* > > > >
