Thank you Doctor. 1. Yes, I am missing (at the moment) adding the contingencies via contab. I'll add them and see the results.
2.Thanks. Carlos El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 17:45, Ray Zimmerman (<[email protected]>) escribió: > See responses below ... > > On Oct 8, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Carlos Ferrandon Cervantes < > [email protected]> wrote: > > 1. Hello everyone. I am running a UC analysis via MOST. If I'm correct, > the values contained in mdo.results.Rpp reflect the contingency upward > reserve. Although I am previously specifying these values in the file > xgd_res_uc, I dont see any result in mdo.results.Rpp by the end of the > simulation, only zero values in that matrix. What would be the cause for > this? > > > Have you defined contingencies for each period? And can you confirm that > the contingency cases are actually different from the base cases? If not, > the contingency reserves will be zero. > > 2. I am aware that Zonal reserves work when a previous value of reserve is > indicated in mdi.FixedReserves.req. I wonder, where can I see the share of > each generator to meet this requirement? I know that it's not a > load-following ramping reserve, and the mdo.results.Rpp is empty as the > endogenous contingency reserves case. > > > The zonal reserve results are reported in … > > mdo.flow(t, 1, 1).mpc.reserves > > … in the R field (see Table 7-6 in the MATPOWER User’s Manual > <https://matpower.org/docs/MATPOWER-manual-7.0.pdf> for details on the > outputs in the mpc.reserves struct. > > Ray > > -- Carlos Ferrandon
