Hi All, I watched the list the last couple of weeks during my "nothing to do in office" job and I noticed, that we ahd a lot of support requests that seems to depend on individual problems to access the install and config information stored in the wiki.
Weeks ago I talked with RĂ¼diger about that in conjuction with my demand to do something in Matterhorn Project he mentiones that the Release Documentation need some loving care. Today I took a first look at the documentation to figure aut whats wrong there. My first idea is, to make the FAQ more prominent on the release page. And then we could gave them a structure: General, Core, Capture Agent. This is a short example: FAQ General Q. What is Matterhorn Core? Q. What is a Matterhorn Capture Agent? ... Matterhorn Core Q. During installation of the third-party tools, which pre-install script should I use? ... Matterhorn Capture Agent Q. Help I didn't have my Epiphan VGA frame grabber installed when I installed my capture agent so I need the driver! Next is, to frequently update the FAQs with questions like "Can I operate Matterhorn Core Version 1.2 and 1.1 Capture Agents?" Maybe we can also set an additional link to tha FAQs in the SVN README.txt. I took a look at that file and recognize, that in 1.2.0 there is a link to trunk documentation. Not shure if I took the wrong source/made a mistake using Fisheye, this is known or this is a bug. I have to admit, that I lost track about who is workin on this part of the wiki to coordinate some basics, can remember that Michelle and Chris workin in that area. Looking forward to your comments regards Nils _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
