On 11-10-03 11:50 AM, Hank Magnuski wrote: > Yes, I assumed there would be a 1.3-RC1 or something similar. A generic > 1.3.x does not allow us to refer to found/fixed bugs in a meaningful way.
Fixed. G > Hank > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Tobias Wunden <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > I assume that Hank is referring to the tags that should be added to > every release candidate along the way to 1.3. For those people just > doing QA, referring to tags is much easier, so cutting the branch > should in theory also have yielded a tag. > > Tobias > > On 03.10.2011, at 18:59, Greg Logan wrote: > > > On 11-10-03 09:43 AM, Hank Magnuski wrote: > >> What is the tag for this release? > > > > Well it *will* be 1.3, but it's not released yet. There's a 1.3.x > > branch, with 1.3.0 being cut (hopefully!) by the end of October. > > > > G > > > >> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Greg Logan <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > >> > >> Good morning! > >> > >> I'm happy to report that I've just cut the 1.3 branch, and it > is now > >> available for testing. The selenium tests do not appear to be > >> functional (fix in progress), however the rest of the tests > all pass so > >> we appear to be in good shape. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
