I know Chris responded to this already, but I figured some people might want to hear it from the horse's mouth. Replies inline.
On 10/24/2011 6:16 PM, Kevin Chan wrote: > Hi all, > > As we @ UC Berkeley are starting to work on running a pilot of > Matterhorn for Spring 2012, we have a few initial questions to pose to > the adopters mtg: > > 1) Status of Epiphan Matterhorn Device development > * Are there issue tracking for bugs/fixes for this device? Not right now. Epiphan's internal bug tracking is not publicly exposed, so your best bet is to open CA tickets on our JIRA instance. > * Who is working on this device (besides Greg Logan)? Just me. I'm working on getting that expanded. Hopefully more new soon! > * How is Epiphan involved? I'm writing an application that lives on their device. They write the OS, the drivers and everything else. They are also the only ones who can package new firmware, so my fixes run past them first. > * When will this device be ready for production use? Soon(tm). You'd have to ask them for a final release date. The integration is currently broken due to some changes they've made recently. I'm working on fixing that over the next few days. When the integration *is* working however, we are darn near complete. There are a few fairly major usability issues left, but the devices are very solid. G _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
