Hi, > Is there possibly something accessing not through the proxy? That url > suggests something connecting on port 8080 I can't see what and how, but I could be wrong? I did block access to port 8080 and this not helped.
> so I think you need a second tenant with port 8080 configured. Do you think like that: id=tenant2 name=Client University server=gwstream-dev.brookes.ac.uk port=8080 Unfortunately, I can't test it now as I am working from home I have lost the connection :( Many thanks, Leslaw On 22 Nov 2011, at 11:31, David Horwitz wrote: > Hi, > > Is there possibly something accessing not through the proxy? That url > suggests something connecting on port 8080 - so I think you need a second > tenant with port 8080 configured. > > D > > On 11/22/2011 01:15 PM, Dr Leslaw Zieleznik wrote: >> >> I did follow this advice and created a tenant file with a contents: >> >> id=tenant >> name=Client University >> server=gwstream-dev.brookes.ac.uk >> port=-1 >> admin_role=ROLE_ADMIN >> anonymous_role=ROLE_ANONYMOUS >> >> I have used the file names: org.opencastproject.organization-tenant.cfg or >> org.opencastproject.organization-mh_default_org.cfg >> And on the security folder, I have created a file tenant.xml which is a copy >> of mh_default_org.xml >> This is all on the rel. 1.2 with Ubuntu 10.10 >> >> I am still getting the message: "WARN (OrganizationFilter:96) - No >> organization is mapped to handle >> http://gwstream-dev.brookes.ac.uk:8080/static/...... >> and obviously I can't play anything on the Media Module. >> >> Strangely enough (or perphaps not ?) the Admin site is working fine through >> the Proxy. >> >> What else I should do? >> >> Leslaw >> >> >> >> >> On 19 Nov 2011, at 07:11, David Horwitz wrote: >> >>> A trick I found - If you're proxying from port 80 - so users are accessing >>> http://matterhorn.somewhere.edu/ you need to set the port in your tenant >>> file to -1 otherwise you will get the "no organization mapped to handle >>> http://matterhorn.somewhere.edu/"; message >>> >>> D >>> >>> On 11/19/2011 12:32 AM, Walter Schwarz wrote: >>>> >>>> I've had trouble in this area and would benefit from a FAQ on the topic. >>>> >>>> [email protected] wrote on 11/18/2011 03:44:37 >>>> PM: >>>> > >>>> > It would be for me! :) >>>> > >>>> > We're just starting our initial tests of matterhorn and we've got it >>>> > behind an apache proxy. >>>> > >>>> > On 11/18/11 1:30 PM, Greg Logan wrote: >>>> > > Hi folks, >>>> > > >>>> > > I've seen a lot of chatter over the last few months about proxies and >>>> > > their issues when ingesting to Matterhorn. Would it be helpful for >>>> > > there to be a common proxy setting entry in the FAQ? We (the U of S) >>>> > > don't use proxies at all so I can't really help there, but it seems >>>> > > like >>>> > > more than a few organizations have been able to get this working and >>>> > > might be able to contribute. >>>> > > >>>> > > Thoughts? >>>> > > >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Matterhorn-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users >> >>
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
