Chris, > > There is really no need to stick new workflow operations into the > > conductor bundle, they may as well live in their own bundle, e.g > > matterhorn-comductor-myinstitution. > I like this idea but I don't understand what you mean by their own > bundle. Would this be a replacement for matterhorn-conductor or live > alongside it? What would the new bundle include in it? Thanks for > helping me to understand this better.
Check out these instructions, they show how to build a new bundle and insert it into an existing Jetty: http://opencast.jira.com/svn/MH/contrib/workflow-operation-handlers/1.1.x/EmailWorkflowOperationHandler/README.TXT If you are only building a workflow operation handler, consider using this template project: http://opencast.jira.com/svn/MH/contrib/workflow-operation-handlers/1.1.x/template/ Chris _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
