Thank you very much for your information Greg, it is really useful. Maybe there is an interesting solution trying to mount a worker on the capture agent machine (or vice versa).
I hope Ruben or someone else on Galicaster team can comment something about that option. Anyway, I will start working on it and I will try to keep the community inform about our progress. Best regards, Fernando Hernández 2012/12/8 Greg Logan <[email protected]> > On 12-12-07 03:53 AM, 費納德費納德 wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > we are thinking to test this solution, a machine that integrates both MH > > elements (traditional Linux based Agent and Server). Does anybody have > > experience on this regard? is it possible? any cons? > > The core is typically very CPU and disk intensive, so capturing at the > same time that the core is processing something could be very very bad > for both of them. Also, if your engage server is also on the same > machine you now have *three* distinct sets of users accessing the same > hardware in a fairly intense way. It's possible, take > testallinone.usask.ca:8080 for example, but it requires some exceedingly > beefy hardware. The example above also does not have a real capture > agent, it's only using a demo capture which is just copied from source > file to output file. > > I know Teltek is doing something similar with Galicaster, in that the > CAs are used as worker nodes when they aren't capturing. You'd have to > speak with Rubencino or someone else on their team for more information > though, I'm not terribly familiar with their product. > > > My supervisor also wants we try another solution, Windows machine with > > TheRec and a Virtual Machine with Linux OS and the Core Server, of > > course, in the same machine. Again, the same questions, any experience? > > cons? possible? > > Possible. Very difficult. We thought about something similar here at > USask, making the host machine the CA, and running the presenter's > machine in a VM. This was mainly scuttled by our local in-room > technical folks who, understandably, are leery of letting us experiment > with production equipment :) > > G > > > Best regards, > > > > Fernando. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Matterhorn-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > >
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
