> should the service itself be fixed > to only return upcoming recordings for the exact device specified or is > this intended to behave as it does?
Neat trick eh? This has been filed as https://opencast.jira.com/browse/MH-8853 a while ago, and basically the workaround is "don't do that". Right now, when you name your CAs like that, the calendars will leak between the two. As far as I know, no CA does any validation that the events in its calendar are actually for *that* CA, although I don't know the specifics anything other than the reference and Epiphan agents. This is definitely not expected behaviour, but we just haven't gotten around to fixing it yet! G
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
