On 11-02-22 02:52 PM, Adam Hochman wrote: > Greg, > Will epiphans' device use the capture-admin services? I ask because > currently this is the only way for the "pre-flight" workflow to advance > from scheduled to capturing which results in the admin ui showing the > proper recording status.
Yes, it has to use the capture-admin services because otherwise it doesn't show up as a CA ;) That being said, one of the major sticking points currently is that it does not report its state often enough for the workflow state to be happy. I'm working on it, but it may be one of those features that comes later. G > On 2/20/11 11:22 AM, Greg Logan wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> Over the next week or so I'm planning on updating the scripts on the >> Epiphan hardware to communicate to with a 1.1(.x) core. How stable are >> the REST endpoints for ingest and scheduling? Are they going to change >> significantly before 1.1 is released? >> >> G >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matterhorn mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn >> >> >> To unsubscribe please email >> [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > To unsubscribe please email > [email protected] > _______________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
