On 2011-02-25 10:18 PM, Christopher Brooks wrote:
> I think we should start by telling them the impact of this; that out of
> the box someone will need to configure things to work with their card.
> They might agree to quit changing things to make it a bit easier on
> us...
> 
> (this would be my preference over leaving people in the cold to "just
> figure it out", especially if they keep changing it and we have just a
> documentation/support nightmare)

Mine as well.  The last change was them bringing their drivers closer to
the v4l spec (good), this most recent one is probably an oversight or a
feature that someone else requested.

> (is there a ticket for this?)

http://opencast.jira.com/browse/MH-6950

G

> Chris
> 
>> Epiphan has yet again changed their drivers (which means we need a 
>> 1.0.3) and will likely need to react to this modifications into the 
>> unforeseeable future.  It seems like you don't need to be a rocket 
>> scientist to manually install epiphan and that it only demands some 
>> minor additions to the docs.  imho, folks interested in building
>> their own capture agents already have the mind set to take these
>> additional steps. thoughts?
>>
>> ~Adam
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matterhorn mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe please email
>> [email protected]
>> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to