Hi Pawel et al, > > So the best > > thing you can do for the project and for yourself is to work > > with the developers on this list to produce the documents > > you need (entity relationships, sequence diagrams, etc). > > > > I thought so too, but I wanted to confirm. > I already started appropriate thread - Maybe I will post an update > how it goes.
Just a note that I would highly recommend focusing on elements of documentation that can be sustainably maintained. My issue with UML is not in modelling per se, but in how the models often get out of sync with the reality of the source code. High level docs that end up lying to you about the status of the code (through neglect because not everyone wants them, has time to maintain them, etc) are not useful. I see much less maintenance of modelling documents on open source projects because they are largely volunteer driven, and see the creation of these documents as a particular pitfall to watch out for. Regards, Chris -- Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938 Phone: 1.306.966.1442 Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory Department of Computer Science University of Saskatchewan 176 Thorvaldson Building 110 Science Place Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C9 _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
