> The just changed the reference implementation for Java to one that is
> fully open source and contains no proprietary code (openjdk). Isn't
> that....ideal (at least in the long run)?
It would've been nice without all the of the Oracle/Apache silliness
with Java.
I appreciate only supporting one db, I just hope it turns out to be
postgresql :) MySQL just doesn't have that much going for it except
inertia.
On 1/11/12 4:02 PM, Christopher Brooks wrote:
Oracle does not have a great track record in this area. Think Java
and OpenOffice.
The just changed the reference implementation for Java to one that is
fully open source and contains no proprietary code (openjdk). Isn't
that....ideal (at least in the long run)?
I'm not a huge Oracle backer, but my goal is to make sure our testing
platform is reliable and sustainable. Two databases is one to many.
MySQL is open source, and used heavily in the enterprise. I think
Postgres is the same. I'm fine with just a show of hands (and
commitment for maintenance) from folks to choose the DB we stick with.
My main interest is in just dropping one of these.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
