Chris, having a tape archive as the primary storage backend is an interesting use case I haven't thought of yet. So asychronicity is mandatory. To answer your question: Yes that should be possible and I'm glad you brought this up so we can consider this in the API design. But it will live somewhere else not in the SolrIndexManager since this won't be extended to be the archive.
Christoph Am 23.02.2012 um 16:28 schrieb Christopher Brooks: > Hi, > > Just tracing through what it means to archive a mediapackage as this > now exists in the episode service and we hacked a process together on > our end - does this just adds the whole thing to solr? > > We archive on tape as we don't have disk storage for raw media > packages, is the thought with this archiving method that things should > sit live? If so, do you (Christoph?) think that there is room for > abstracting org.opencastproject.episode.impl.solr.SolrIndexManager into > a Manager API that might be able to handle async requests to a tape > system? > > Chris > -- > Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc > ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan > > Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938 > Phone: 1.306.966.1442 > Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory > Department of Computer Science > University of Saskatchewan > 176 Thorvaldson Building > 110 Science Place > Saskatoon, SK > S7N 5C9 > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > To unsubscribe please email > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
