I have nothing against the current way of working, but I'm always +1 for whatever makes things simpler :)
2012/3/20 Ruediger Rolf <[email protected]> > +1 for integrating Felix > > +1 for Felix 4.0 compatibility in Matterhorn 1.4 > > Rüdiger > > Am 19.03.2012 18:17, schrieb Tobias Wunden: > > I like this idea. Which version of felix are you thinking of using? I >>> changed the README to say felix 3.2.2 since we know that works (and 4.0 >>> doesn't), so if we use a different version then the README should be >>> updated. >>> >> We are working on Felix 4.0 compatibility. >> >> Tobias >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Matterhorn mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opencastproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/**matterhorn<http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn> >> >> >> To unsubscribe please email >> matterhorn-unsubscribe@**opencastproject.org<[email protected]> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> > > > -- > > ______________________________**__________________ > Rüdiger Rolf, M.A. > Universität Osnabrück - Zentrum virtUOS > Heger-Tor-Wall 12, 49069 Osnabrück > Telefon: (0541) 969-6511 - Fax: (0541) 969-16511 > E-Mail: [email protected] > Internet: www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Matterhorn mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/**matterhorn<http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn> > > > To unsubscribe please email > matterhorn-unsubscribe@**opencastproject.org<[email protected]> > ______________________________**_________________ >
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
