> svn is obsolete and not a good version control tool for so many > contributors. I pointed out the many advantages of git already. > And right now you all see how "good" svn is at branching/merging > back/whatever (just have a look at the broken trunk). I don't want to > say "I said it" but... I said it.
Git doesn't magically fix mergebacks. When there is a conflict because of out of order editing a human needs to fix it. Neither git nor svn will do this automatically. Are you suggesting that a change to git will mean our trunk never breaks? Chris -- Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938 Phone: 1.306.966.1442 Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory Department of Computer Science University of Saskatchewan 176 Thorvaldson Building 110 Science Place Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C9 _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
