On 12-04-16 09:49 AM, Rubén Pérez wrote: > FWIW, I really like it. It feels more organized from my point of view. > > great work!
I agree, although I still think it should be packaged up in its own top level directory. G > 2012/4/16 Tobias Wunden <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Chris, > > > How does exclusion of these effect testing? Will people just not test > > ldap/cas now? > > that is indeed the case. However, it does not make sense to add a > random configuration to trunk (UC Berkeley in this case), and have > this deployed with each and every installation of Matterhorn, > eventually getting into your way when doing your own authentication > setup. > > You have been talking about test plans in another e-mail and my > suggestion would be to establish some of theses tests and assign > them to institutions that are acutally running these directory > integrations. > > > I'm fine with these changes, but am of course keen to see docs updated > > too, > > Documentation updates are on my todo list. I was just holding off to > hear if there were objections to the new structure. > > Tobias > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > To unsubscribe please email > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > To unsubscribe please email > [email protected] > _______________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
