> > It would be a good idea too to separate the CA release cycle from > > the core release cycles. It would probably help to get the APIs > > more stable. And the CA has other milestones like th release of a > > new Ubuntu version, that the Core system. Unfortunately this would > > probably mean that we would need a release managment for the CA too > > and we would need a QA phase for this. Another pro would be that > > testing the CA and the core can be more focused than, as we don not > > need to evaluate the whole system. > > I agree.
I don't agree with this until our QA process is more clear. At least right now we test a 1.4 agent against a 1.4 core. If we separate them I don't know what it would mean to have a 1.5 agent - it might just work with nothing. In principle I agree, but until our QA practice catches up I don't think we can afford to separate them. Chris -- Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938 Phone: 1.306.966.1442 Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory Department of Computer Science University of Saskatchewan 176 Thorvaldson Building 110 Science Place Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C9 _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
