On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:59:51 +0200 Tobias Wunden <[email protected]> wrote:
> As a consequence, implementors (including Opencast itself for the > reference platform) do *not* need to and also should not send > catalogs as long as they are not looking to overwrite what's on the > server. Also note that this implementation allows for series or Just a note that I would expect whoever implements this on the reference side would still have the ability to ingest all metadata, as someone might be using the Matterhorn reference capture agent code and not using the core processing. Off the top of my head I don't know if we enrich the metadata that goes to the core, but I would expect that some agents might want to change it, so overwriting it by default from the capture agent doesn't seem like a bad thing (can I get a use case where it might be?) Chris -- Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938 Phone: 1.306.966.1442 Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory Department of Computer Science University of Saskatchewan 176 Thorvaldson Building 110 Science Place Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C9 _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
