That seems a very elegant approach to me.

2012/6/20 Tobias Wunden <[email protected]>

> Hi Judy,
>
> that's a valid concern! Maybe we can take the approach of adding a new xml
> nespace andnin addition to the url add an atribute for the id:
>
> <video src="url.mp4" mh:element="975-5393-..." ...
>
> Tobias
>
> On 20.06.2012, at 18:59, Judy Stern <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Forgive the technical naivete of this question, but (although I see the
> advantages of using mediapackage ids) if we switch to using mediapackage
> id's, do we not lose the universality of the SMIL format? Seems to me that
> one advantage of using SMIL is that other players (that know nothing of
> matterhorn mediapackages) could make use of our "playlists". Again,
> apologies if you see this as a silly or irrelevant concern...it just jumped
> out at me.
>
> Judy
>
> p.s. Of course, once mediapackages themselves become a universal standard
> for storing videos, as Pawel suggests in a different thread, there's
> nothing to worry about,  right?;-)
>
>
>
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 3:08 AM, Tobias Wunden wrote:
>
> Hi Rüdiger,
>
>
> it seems that SMIL may indeed be a good fit for what we are looking for.
> One question that came to mind is:
>
>
> Should we use the mediapackage's track id or even the track's flavor
> instead of the filename? We may have different tracks in a mediapackage
> with the given name, and it should be considered that it's not only the
> player that is evaluating the SMIL instructions but also other services,
> for example those that are creating reencoded versions of the video(s)
> based on the playlist.
>
>
> Another thought (tying into the same topic) is that there may be
> institutions that would like to pull in attachments as well (I remember Len
> from Harvard talking about how they would like to pull up images of slides
> during video playback that would most probably be attached to the
> mediapackage as attachments). This again indicates to me that the
> mediapackage element id may be a good thing to use rather than filenames.
>
>
> I am looking forward to anyone's thoughts on this.
>
>
> Tobias
>
>
> On 18.06.2012, at 13:44, Ruediger Rolf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi list,
>
>
> as we have encountered on the Harvard Un-Conference there are currently
> some groups working on video editing functions. The bandwith of the ideas
> that came up during the discussions was from compositions of video segments
> that are remixed in the browser, over services that re-encode the video
> based on the playlist up to streaming servers that exclude parts of the
> video without the player even knowing this.
>
>
> I feel the strong need that we agree on a common exchange format of the
> needed video edit list. From my point of view it would be the best to use
> an open standard for this and so SMIL 3.0 Tiny Profile [1] seems to be a
> good choice.
>
>
> As an example a "playlist" for a single stream video might look like this:
>
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>
> <smil xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/Language";>
>
> <body>
>
>  <seq>
>
>    <video src="lecturer.mpg" clipBegin="00:01:44.360"
> clipEnd="00:04:06.720"/>
>
>        <video src="lecturer.mpg" clipBegin="00:38:54.480"
> clipEnd="00:50:08.240"/>
>
>        <video src="lecturer.mpg" clipBegin="00:59:56.640"
> clipEnd="01:13:51.720"/>
>
>    <video src="lecturer.mpg" clipBegin="00:31:28.440"
> clipEnd="00:49:30.280"/>
>
>  </seq>
>
> </body>
>
> </smil>
>
>
>
> If we have a dual stream video it might look like this:
>
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>
> <smil xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/Language";>
>
> <body>
>
>  <seq>
>
>    <par>
>
>    <video src="lecturer.mpg" clipBegin="00:01:44.360"
> clipEnd="00:04:06.720"/>
>
>    <video src="vga.mpg" clipBegin="00:01:44.360" clipEnd="00:04:06.720"/>
>
>    </par>
>
>    <par>
>
>        <video src="lecturer.mpg" clipBegin="00:38:54.480"
> clipEnd="00:50:08.240"/>
>
>        <video src="vga.mpg" clipBegin="00:38:54.480"
> clipEnd="00:50:08.240"/>
>
>    </par>
>
>    <par>
>
>        <video src="lecturer.mpg" clipBegin="00:59:56.640"
> clipEnd="01:13:51.720"/>
>
>        <video src="vga.mpg" clipBegin="00:59:56.640"
> clipEnd="01:13:51.720"/>
>
>    </par>
>
>    <par>
>
>    <video src="lecturer.mpg" clipBegin="00:31:28.440"
> clipEnd="00:49:30.280"/>
>
>    <video src="vga.mpg" clipBegin="00:31:28.440" clipEnd="00:49:30.280"/>
>
>    </par>
>
>  </seq>
>
> </body>
>
> </smil>
>
>
> In general it might be useful to create a (REST)-service that delivers the
> SMIL file that the current service needs. So in the player we need one of
> the distribution copies (streaming or not), while we would need a link to
> the source files for a re-emcoding and we might need a link to the file in
> the file-system on the streaming server.
>
> Specialized output formats like simple JSON lists that the REST-endpoint
> creates might be a valid export format for the player too.
>
>
> So I'm open for comments on this issue. What do others think about this
> proposal? Are there alternative formats to SMIL that are worth considering?
>
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/smil/smil-tiny-profile.html
>
>
> --
>
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> Rüdiger Rolf, M.A.
>
> Universität Osnabrück - Zentrum virtUOS
>
> Heger-Tor-Wall 12, 49069 Osnabrück
>
> Telefon: (0541) 969-6511 - Fax: (0541) 969-16511
>
> E-Mail:[email protected]
>
> Internet:www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Matterhorn mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please email
>
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Matterhorn mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe please email
>
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Matterhorn mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>
>
> To unsubscribe please email
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Matterhorn mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
>
>
> To unsubscribe please email
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
>
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to