On 9/11/2012 10:29 AM, Christopher Brooks wrote: > Hi, > >> 3 (Proposal). Continuing from point 2, committers who have not >> contributed in more than a month will retire to committers emeritus. >> Hopefully this will prompt our institutional leads to commit to public >> Matterhorn development. > > -1: One month is not enough time. People often are committers that want > to participate but at a dramatically reduced rater. There is no harm > in them being on the committers list. I would support a 6 month until > emeritus action.
See my reply to Ruben. I'm not trying to pare down the committers list, but I do think we need a handle on who is actually active in the project. >> 6. To address C, I'm going to start sending out emails containing a >> summary of the unassigned bugs for the current release. This will >> increase the visibility of these tickets so that developers become >> aware of them and address them. > > If the frequency is too high it's going to be ignored. Since you're in > a strong position on the release, can I suggest approaching individual > institutions with committers to see if they will fix particular bugs? > I know we're getting infrastructure (e.g. lists of managers) in place > for that at the moment... I'm thinking of rolling the ticket review into the dev meeting agenda email so that there's less spam and more of an impetus for people to read them. We'll see how things work out and what kind of response they get. Approaching the institutions will be part of increasing that visibility, especially once we can match up the institutional skillset versus the bugs in question. G > Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
