It seems like we came to a conclusion? If so, it would be helpful to have these 
agreements formulated in a ticket, everyone should feel free to step up :-)

Tobias

On 10.10.2012, at 18:55, Judy Stern <[email protected]> wrote:

> That's a reasonable sol'n (it's not schizo behavior to any individual user); 
> I'd suggest if we do this, that we remove the Media Gallery link from the 
> upper right watch page (since it's just a duplicate link), and provide a tool 
> tip for the logo. 
> Like my solution #4, it likely requires a little more development work (i.e. 
> looking at user's permissions to determine where the link should go); anybody 
> available to do this? 
> 
> Judy
> 
> 
> On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:27 AM, Rubén Pérez wrote:
> 
>> I think we should have that "schizophrenic" logo, but instead of having 
>> different behaviours depending on the machine (admin, engage), we should 
>> have different behaviours depending on the user. If the user has "admin" 
>> rights, then send him to the welcome page. If the user has no "admin" 
>> privileges, then send him/her to the media module. 
>> 
>> Or is that still too messy?
>> 
>> Rubén Pérez
>> TELTEK Video Research
>> www.teltek.es
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2012/10/1 Judy Stern <[email protected]>
>> To those who plan to expose the Matterhorn Media Module to learners:
>> 
>> Currently the Matterhorn logo (in the upper left with tooltip "Back to 
>> Opencast Matterhorn Welcome Page") links to (or is supposed to link to) the 
>> Matterhorn Welcome page. This makes complete sense for users who have access 
>> to the admin UI (in which the logo always links to the Welcome page), but 
>> not so much to those users who only have access to Engage. (MH-9175 is the 
>> bug that started this conversation.)
>> 
>> How many of you actually leave the ootb Matterhorn logo exposed to your 
>> Engage users? (i.e. don't rebrand with your own institution's logo and don't 
>> change the href?)
>> 
>> If some of you do leave it exposed to users (as is), we should come up with 
>> a solution.
>> I think it's a bad idea to have a single schizophrenic logo (i.e.for users 
>> that do have admin access, having different behaviors depending on whether 
>> one is in Engage or Admin); instead, here are some simple alternatives:
>> 1) Create a new logo to be used in Engage (maybe by compositing the existing 
>> logo with text such as  "Media Gallery") and have it link to the Media 
>> Gallery (which is essentially "Home" for engage-only users). I'm no graphic 
>> artist, but I think I can handle the compositing (if I can get ahold of the 
>> logo source file).
>> 2) Remove the logo altogether on Engage pages.
>> 3) Remove the logo and, on the watch pages, move the link to the Media 
>> Gallery from its current location next to the Search box to the left (i.e. 
>> replaces the logo); I think we should drop the "Go to" from link name, btw, 
>> regardless of where the link lives.
>> 4) Create an alternative Matterhorn Welcome page to link to for those who 
>> don't have access to the Admin UI, but maintain the behavior for Admin UI 
>> users of the logo going to the "full" Welcome page. This is probably not 
>> quite as simple as the other solutions since it has to look at the user's 
>> permissions to determine where the link should go; would anyone be willing 
>> to take this on? (fwiw, I like this solution best, since it allows admin 
>> users to continue to move between the applications more or less seamlessly)
>> 
>> Your thoughts? Other ideas?
>> 
>> Judy
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to