Good day. Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 01:50:27PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 02:48:53PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:45:45PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > > Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:29:44AM -0600, Josh Butikofer wrote: > > > > Because this patch changes some fundamental Maui scheduling code, > > > > one of the other developers here wants to do a thorough review > > > > of the changes you've proposed. He says that this will probably occur > > > > before the end of the month. Sorry for the delay. We are confident > > > > that your changes will have no negative side-effects for the community, > > > > but we need to make sure it is the best direction for the > > > > code. I hope you can understand our position. > > > > > > Yeah, sure -- the review will be very good, so I am for it: I could > > > overlook something or took the suboptimal path. So I am understanding > > > your position and supporting it ;)) > > > > > > > I'll keep you posted. > > > > Any news on the patch I coined? > > Had not heard anything about my (old) patch for the default partition > handling. I had ported it to the patchlevel 20, since it was not > applied cleanly to some snapshot. The attached files are the new > patches that are applying cleanly to the latest snapshot, > maui-3.2.6p20-snap.12126171145. > > So, what is the status of this patch? Was it reviewed? It works > for almost a year at our cluster, if someone is interested ;))
It is more than a year past from the first submission of this patch. Is there something I can do to get it accepted (or permanently rejected ;)) to the Maui? I am eager to finish this issue and move to the other ones. Thanks! -- Eygene Ryabinkin, Russian Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
pgpbI7qrJeE86.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mauiusers mailing list [email protected] http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
