On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 03:13:20PM -0500, Michael Homa alleged: > On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) wrote: > > > would setting resources_max.nodect=4 for the queue in torque do what you > > need? > > Hi Joe: > > Yes, that would work. But, and I didn't really explain this at all in my > note (was trying to be brief), I'm trying to have Maui do all the "policy > stuff" and have torque just define the resource(s). I'd like to avoid having > some policies in torque and some policies in Maui. If there's no way to do
A practical reason to have as much policy in torque as possible is because of error messages. When you violate a policy in torque, the user gets immediate feedback because the job is rejected with an error message. When you violate a policy in maui, the job sits around deferred until someone bothers to check on it. -- Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin University of Southern California The pro-disease movement: http://www.jennymccarthybodycount.com/
pgpt4uUKwaK6B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mauiusers mailing list [email protected] http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
