I just download the maui-3.2.6p21 version from the cluster resource site
and extract it. It is extracted to the directory maui-3.2.6p21, but in fact
it is 3.2.6p20 version, see CHANGELOG.

So there is the error, you must download a maui snapshot to obtain the
version with fixes applied for 64 bit

Can someone from clusterresources adjust the download link on the site for
3.2.6p21 please?

Regards

Wickliffe, Blake W wrote:
> Right...but my suspicion is that we are facing something else, since Brian 
> claims the issue with the 32/64bit was fixed in 3.2.6p21, which we are 
> already on.
> 
> Unless I am misunderstanding you?
> 
> Blake Wickliffe
> Saudi Aramco
> ENOD/CSYS/USG HPC Team
> (873-4417)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Garrick [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:35 AM
> To: Wickliffe, Blake W
> Cc: Maui Users
> Subject: Re: [Mauiusers] Corrupt node feature list
> 
> That's fine. 32bit maui build works fine on 64bit host talking to a
> 64bit pbs_server.
> 
> HPCC/Linux Systems Admin
> 
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 9:23 PM, "Wickliffe, Blake W" <[email protected]
>  > wrote:
> 
>> Unfortunately, we are already using 3.2.6p21, and it is on a 64-bit
>> system.  So, if that's the case, even reverting back to 32-bit might
>> not work.
>>
>> Blake Wickliffe
>> Saudi Aramco
>> ENOD/CSYS/USG HPC Team
>> (873-4417)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:mauiusers-
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Christiansen
>> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 9:27 PM
>> To: Maui Users
>> Subject: Re: [Mauiusers] Corrupt node feature list
>>
>> There was an issue, previously, where you could only have 32 node
>> features on a 64bit system without seeing side effects. If you aren't
>> using the latest snapshot, you could try it and see if it helps.
>>
>> From the changelog:
>> Maui 3.2.6p21
>> - Fixed 64bit issue. Maui assumed ints were always 8 bytes for 64bit
>> systems even though x86_64 ints are still 4 bytes. This lead to
>> aliasing
>> of large indexed node properties to smaller indexed properties. Maui
>> now
>> triggers off of sizeof(int). Thanks goes to Alexis Cousein.
>>
>> Brian Christiansen
>>
>> Garrick Staples wrote:
>>> Please start new threads with the "new" button in your email
>>> client, not with the "reply" button.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:04:21PM +0300, Wickliffe, Blake W alleged:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> Has anyone experienced a problem with Maui corrupting the features
>>>> list of nodes after a certain number of nodes are added?
>>>>
>>>> On our cluster, we have 2336 nodes, most of which have only 1
>>>> "Feature" or "Property" in the Torque parlance.  However,
>>>> immediately upon adding another node, we start seeing things like:
>>>>
>>>> Features:   [[NONE]][checki][datai]
>>>>
>>>> When doing a "checknode" on various nodes.  The problem only gets
>>>> worse and more extensive as further nodes are added.  Deleting the
>>>> nodes from the qmgr brings everything back to normal.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>> Yes, I've seen this with 64bit builds.  Build maui 32bit and it
>>> won't happen.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mauiusers mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mauiusers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
>>
>> The contents of this email, including all related responses, files
>> and attachments transmitted with it (collectively referred to as
>> "this Email"), are intended solely for the use of the individual/
>> entity to whom/which they are addressed, and may contain
>> confidential and/or legally privileged information. This Email may
>> not be disclosed or forwarded to anyone else without authorization
>> from the originator of this Email. If you have received this Email
>> in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies
>> from your system. Please note that the views or opinions presented
>> in this Email are those of the author and may not necessarily
>> represent those of Saudi Aramco. The recipient should check this
>> Email and any attachments for the presence of any viruses. Saudi
>> Aramco accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus/error
>> transmitted by this Email.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mauiusers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
> 
> The contents of this email, including all related responses, files and 
> attachments transmitted with it (collectively referred to as "this Email"), 
> are intended solely for the use of the individual/entity to whom/which they 
> are addressed, and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged 
> information. This Email may not be disclosed or forwarded to anyone else 
> without authorization from the originator of this Email. If you have received 
> this Email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all 
> copies from your system. Please note that the views or opinions presented in 
> this Email are those of the author and may not necessarily represent those of 
> Saudi Aramco. The recipient should check this Email and any attachments for 
> the presence of any viruses. Saudi Aramco accepts no liability for any damage 
> caused by any virus/error transmitted by this Email.
> _______________________________________________
> mauiusers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers


-- 
********************************************************************
*  Bas van der Vlies                    e-mail: [email protected]       *
*  SARA - Academic Computing Services   Amsterdam, The Netherlands *
********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
mauiusers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers

Reply via email to