AFRICA: No ''magic bullets' to end poverty: Q&A with Jeffrey Sachs

[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]


JOHANNESBURG, 20 March (IRIN) - In 2005 economist Jeffrey Sachs presented an 
action plan to meet the UN's poverty-slashing Millennium Development Goals 
(MDGs) by 2015, which included practical and affordable interventions such as 
bed-nets to fight malaria, vaccinations to combat infectious diseases, the 
provision of anti-AIDS drugs, fertilisers to improve crop yields and drilling 
wells to provide safe drinking water.

Sachs's action plan is being implemented in several hamlets in Malawi, Kenya 
and Ethiopia, and forms the basis of the UN Millennium Village Project, in 
which research is being carried out by the Earth Institute of Columbia 
University, with financial support from the Japanese government, to find a 
model for fighting poverty at village level.

Sachs, who heads the UN Millennium Project and the Earth Institute, has been 
criticised for suggesting strategies that have been implemented before and 
failed.

In a wide-ranging interview with IRIN, Sachs defended his plan and provided 
some details on how the project is going to help poor countries help themselves.



QUESTION: Critics have claimed that your poverty reduction strategies are in 
essence a collection of development policies that have been tried and failed in 
the past. 

ANSWER: It is more accurate to say that our strategies are a collection of 
development policies that have been tried and have succeeded in the past. The 
Millennium Project has identified a large number of proven, highly effective, 
low-cost interventions that can make a huge difference in meeting the MDGs by 
tapping into expert networks in health, education, gender, agronomy, hydrology 
and engineering, among other areas of expertise.

Our recommendations build on success stories, albeit success stories that have 
rarely been scaled up to full national impact because of the lack of needed 
funding for national-scale programmes. There are also a number of other 
characteristics of our recommendations - the project takes an integrated 
approach to the problems facing the extreme poor. 

There are no 'magic bullets', no single solution that will put an end to global 
poverty; achieving the MDGs is possible only if many needs are addressed 
simultaneously and at scale. The Millennium Project has also identified several 
quick wins - interventions such as the mass distribution of insecticide-treated 
bed nets and school feeding programmes - that could be undertaken rapidly and 
effectively to improve and save the lives of millions. 

Importantly, the Millennium Project has shown that all of this can be done at 
very low cost: meeting the MDGs would require less than 0.7 percent of a rich 
country's gross national product, the amount of official development assistance 
the rich countries have committed to giving repeatedly in recent decades, and 
most recently as part of the Monterrey Consensus in 2002. 

Q: The Millennium Project has begun working with the UN system in selected 
countries to help identify the best ways to integrate MDG targets and timelines 
into national poverty-reduction strategies. What lessons have been learnt?

A: The Millennium Project is currently supporting around a dozen countries in 
preparing MDG-based national development strategies, and has had a rich and 
rewarding engagement with the governments, other partners and civil society in 
these countries. As a project, this experience has informed our overall 
messages and recommendations in an important way - it is quite clear that 
national governments are strongly committed to the MDGs. 

In most countries local communities have also demonstrated that known, proven 
and effective technologies exist to achieve the goals. Indeed, many countries 
already have clear, ambitious programmes to achieve the goals. Most of these 
countries, however, are too poor to finance the needed investments on their 
own, and thus need more external assistance. 

Another important lesson is that the quality of aid matters tremendously. It is 
most effective when it is spent on tangible, measurable goods and services, so 
that both donor and recipient can be held accountable for the effective 
implementation of aid programmes. Aid should also be predictable and long-term, 
and often must cover not only capital costs but also recurrent expenditures, 
for example, nursing and agricultural extension, with the aim of building local 
capacity over time.   

Q: The Millennium Village research project offers a model for fighting poverty 
at the village level. How do you measure the success of the model?

A: The success of the Millennium Village model is to be judged according to the 
MDGs, and also whether the community achieves a path of self-sustaining 
economic growth. We expect the communities to achieve the MDGs by 2015, and 
perhaps by 2010. We also expect the communities to start a process of dynamic 
saving and capital accumulation that permits long-term economic growth, and for 
this to happen as well before 2015. 

Q: The model village approach seems to focus on stopping the corrosive impact 
of poverty, but will economic growth come from the villages, or should we be 
looking at measures that can create the environment for growth, such as 
investment and tax laws?

A: Economic growth requires an adequate policy environment to promote saving 
and investment and trade, but also a basic infrastructure that is adequate for 
the private sector. Thus, good rules are not enough.  A modern economy requires 
a healthy population, a literate workforce, a food-secure community, safe 
drinking water, and roads, power, telecommunications and port facilities to be 
able to engage in trade. Thus, the debate between 'institutions' versus 
'investments' is silly - economies need both adequate institutions and a basic 
level of investments. In our experience, the investment levels in health, 
education, food production and infrastructure are currently the most urgent 
limiting factors in many settings. 

Q: There is also a Millennium Cities Project. What are its goals and what are 
the particular challenges faced by African cities?

A: Millennium Villages address rural development, and the Millennium Cities 
Project is designed to complement those rural, agriculture-based interventions 
by enabling regional cities near the villages to be effective markets for the 
rural areas, and effective export centres for regional and global trade. The 
Millennium Cities Initiative will work with local governments near the 
Millennium Villages to attract foreign direct investment, while working with 
potential international investors to inform them about possible investment 
opportunities. 

Eventually, the Millennium Cities Initiative will also help to develop urban 
needs assessments in key sectors such as health, education, housing and access 
to safe water. The needs assessments will form the basis of local investment 
plans geared towards meeting the MDGs in those cities.  

Q: How optimistic are you about finding funding for the various projects?

A: I am optimistic that the Millennium Villages and Millennium Cities will find 
a widening arc of financial support from both private and public sectors. We 
have already found a wonderful response from the philanthropic community to 
support the villages, as well as growing interest among multinational companies 
concerning job-creating investments in Africa. Now some governments are also 
expressing their interest in the Millennium Village project - the government of 
Japan is a major partner in the effort. 



[ENDS]

This is non-reply e-mail. Please do not hesitate to contact us at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

IRIN-SA
Tel: +27 11 895-1900
Fax: +27 11 784-6759
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Principal donors: IRIN is generously supported by Australia, Canada, Denmark, 
ECHO, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and 
the United States of America. For more information, go to: 
http://www.IRINnews.org/donors

[This item comes to you via IRIN, a UN humanitarian news and information 
service, but may not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its 
agencies. All IRIN material may be reposted or reprinted free-of-charge; refer 
to the copyright page (Http://www.irinnews.org/copyright ) for conditions of 
use. IRIN is a project of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian 
Affairs.] 

To make changes to or cancel your subscription visit:
http://www.irinnews.org/subscriptions/subslogin.asp



Subscriber: [email protected]
Keyword: AFRICA

U N I T E D  N A T I O N S
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
Integrated Regional Information Network (IRIN) - 1995-2005 ten years serving 
the humanitarian community


_______________________________________________
M-net mailing list
[email protected]
http://mauritanie-net.com/mailman/listinfo/m-net_mauritanie-net.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mauritanie-Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Mauritanie-Net
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Répondre à