AFRICA: AU panel wants African court for Habre

[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]


BANJUL, 1 July (IRIN) - Adding another twist to a six-year drama over the fate 
of former Chadian president Hissene Habre, who is accused of massive rights 
abuse, an expert panel of the African Union has recommended that an "African 
solution" decide his fate, apparently slamming the door on an extradition 
demand by Belgium and putting his host country Senegal back in the spotlight.

Habre, accused by a group of Chadian victims of being responsible for mass 
torture, killings and other abuses while president of the north-central African 
country in the 1980s, has denied any implication in atrocities, and courts in 
Senegal where he has lived since fleeing a coup in 1990 have twice refused to 
try him.

Alleged victims of Habre in 2001 subsequently filed complaints under Belgium's 
universal jurisdiction law, which allows judges in Brussels to prosecute human 
rights offences anywhere. But when a Senegalese court late in 2005 declared it 
was not competent to rule on the Belgian extradition request, the AU set up a 
panel to discuss his fate.

According to a text of the panel's report released to AU ministers late on 
Friday and obtained by IRIN, the panel recommends Habre should take the stand 
in either Chad or Senegal, face trial by an ad-hoc tribunal anywhere in Africa, 
or a hearing in a court in any of the 45 African states that have ratified the 
convention against torture.

A final decision will be taken by the 52 African heads of state gathered this 
weekend in the Gambian capital Banjul for an AU summit meeting.

The report said the panel "rejects" total impunity for Habre, even though he is 
a former head of state, because of the "nature and gravity of the crimes he is 
accused of."

But the panel also recommended an "African solution be adopted", and specified 
that Habre should only be tried by an African court, pulling the Belgium option 
off the table.

The panel found that Senegal is the most suitable place to try Habre, the text 
said, and it added that contrary to the judgement of Senegalese courts, Senegal 
does have jurisdiction over the case and has an obligation to respect the 
conditions of the torture convention.

In May, the UN Committee Against Torture issued a statement giving Senegal 90 
days to put Habre on trial or send him to Belgium. The Committee said Senegal 
had broken international human rights rules by not dealing with Habre during 
the 15 years of his exile there.

Hissene Habre's lawyer El Hadj Diouf, speaking to reporters on the fringe of 
the AU summit in Banjul, said: "Senegal is not a colony. Senegal is independent 
and the justice of Senegal is independent. This case is finished. Habre must 
stay in Senegal in peace indefinitely."

Asked why Habre does not want to stand trial in Belgium to clear his name, 
Diouf said: "Belgium is a colonialist. Belgium created a genocide in Rwanda and 
Congo. Belgium cannot accuse an African man, it is the new colonisation. Why 
Belgium? Hissein Habre is a Chadian."

Sy Coumba Singa Gali, Editor in Chief of the Chadian newspaper L'Observateur, 
told IRIN: "Habre must be judged, that is the most important."

A counsel with one of the American groups that has pushed hardest for Habre's 
trial, Reed Brody of Human Rights Watch, said: "The important thing is the 
victims get their day in court and Habre gets a fair trial. We would have 
preferred that Habre be tried in Belgium only because Senegal has betrayed the 
victims twice. And because Belgium has now spent four years preparing and 
investigating the dossier."

But Jacqueline Moudeina, a lawyer for torture victims in Chad, was disappointed 
with the decision. She said the claimants were already concerned about the time 
their case had taken to be heard, and she worried the panel's decision would 
drag it out even longer.

"For me the best option was Belgium and uniquely Belgium because we could have 
had a real trial there, with good organisation, and speed," Moudeina added. "It 
was really the best option."
 
nr/ccr
 


[ENDS]

This is non-reply e-mail. Please do not hesitate to contact us at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

Principal donors: IRIN is generously supported by Australia, Canada, Denmark, 
ECHO, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and 
the United States of America. For more information, go to: 
http://www.IRINnews.org/donors

[This item comes to you via IRIN, a UN humanitarian news and information 
service, but may not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its 
agencies. All IRIN material may be reposted or reprinted free-of-charge; refer 
to the copyright page (Http://www.irinnews.org/copyright ) for conditions of 
use. IRIN is a project of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian 
Affairs.] 

To make changes to or cancel your subscription visit:
http://www.irinnews.org/subscriptions



Subscriber: [email protected]
Keyword: AFRICA

U N I T E D  N A T I O N S
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
Integrated Regional Information Network (IRIN) - 1995-2005 ten years serving 
the humanitarian community


_______________________________________________
M-net mailing list
[email protected]
http://mauritanie-net.com/mailman/listinfo/m-net_mauritanie-net.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mauritanie-Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Mauritanie-Net
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Répondre à