On Thursday 14 February 2002 22:21, Gerald de Jong wrote:
> would you call it sloppy if we changed the word "cascading" into
> "inheritance"? virtually the same thing happens in your java code, so why
> not in the maverick.xml command hierarchy?
btw, another way to represent an inheritance hierarchy in maverick.xml would
be to use something resembling Ant's build.xml with its dependencies (rather
than nesting the tags). with Ant you say depends="OtherTask", whereas in
Java we would say "extends OtherClass", so maybe..
<maverick>
<class name="root">
<view.../>
<view.../>
</class>
<class name="secure" extends="root">
<view.../>
<command>
<view.../>
<view.../>
</command>
<command../>
</class>
</maverick>
--
Beautiful Code BV
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.beautifulcode.nl
_______________________________________________
Mav-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mav-user
