Personally I think this may just confuse things. Right now the behavior of a redirect is pretty straightforward--its sending a physical redirect to the browser, telling it to ask for the new url you specify (this could be a .html, .jsp, .m, .fo, .pdf, /servlet/foo, whatever). I'm not sure I see what we would achieve be redirecting to a logical view. Are you trying to avoid the roundtrip to the browser and do something closer to a RequestDispather.include() or RequestDispather.forward()?
Either way, I don't think I'm in favor of compromising the straightforwardness of the standard redirect view as right now it does exactly what one would expect. That is not to say however that there is no room for this functionality if you need it. Rather than modifying RedirectView, why not take a stab at creating your own LogicalRedirectView, which would take a maverick command as the path attribute, like so: <view name="success" type="logicalRedirect" path="welcome"/> Maverick is remarkably pluggable, so plugging in new view types is pretty straigtforward. Check out opt-domify as an example of plugging in a custom view type. --jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy Truelove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:24 AM Subject: [Mav-user] specifying redirects in the maverick.xml file > Hello all, > > I have a proposal to deal with redirects in the maverick.xml file. > Right now redirect paths to commands have to be "hardcoded", insofar as you > have to specify the redirect not as a logical command name but as a physical > URL, i.e.: > > <view name="success" type="redirect" path="welcome.m"/> > > I'd like to write a patch that would support this type of functionality : > > <view name="success" type="redirect" path="welcome"> > <param name="isCommand" value="true"/> > </view> > > As well as a standard redirect to a non-command: > > <view name="success" type="redirect" path="somePage.html"/> > > This way all references to commands are logical references rather than > physical. > > If this sounds like a good idea, please let me know, and I'll get cracking. > > Thanks, > Roy > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > No, I will not fix your computer. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Mav-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mav-user > Archives are available at http://www.mail-archive.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek No, I will not fix your computer. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mav-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mav-user Archives are available at http://www.mail-archive.com/
