Eelco, Fantastic! Thanks for the example!
I agree with Jeff that Maverich doesn't need documentation because it's simple. It’s 80/20 rule? 80% of the time you don't need documentation for Maverick at all :~), but those 20% of rare cases will make you read source. Just my $0.02. Struts' online documentation is more targeted at novice inexperienced developers, whereas Maverick is for those who tried everything else and got disappointed. This is one of the reasons Struts got so much attention (7 books published!) despite the unnecessary complexity and all really hard time it gives to its adopters. So Maverick remains a hidden gem in ocean of J2EE application frameworks. Regards, Valeri --- --------- Original Message --------- DATE: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:10:27 From: "Eelco Hillenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: >That's done. For the people who are interested in the example, you can >download it from: http://80.89.232.168/maverickexample-1.0.zip > >I'll keep it there for about two weeks. I hope there's not too many bugs >in them; it's (the framework) work in progress. If you do find em, or >have any other comments, please drop me a line. > >As I said earlier, you can build it (and get the dependencies) with >maven. Please read the README file first. > >Hope you have fun with it, > >Eelco Hillenius > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including >Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. >Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 >[INVALID FOOTER] > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 [INVALID FOOTER]
