Hi Jeff, I'm certainly willing to give it a shot. Like you said, the code base is very easy to understand so there shouldn't be any problems. I'll make a patch and some test cases that you can have a look at. If it fits nicely into the design, it could be incorporated into CVS. This would add flexibility to Maverick, IMO, without much effort or intrusiveness.
Regards, Greger. -----Original Message----- From: Schnitzer, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 11 februari 2004 05:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Pluggable ControllerFactory (again). > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I had a look in the mailing list archives on the discussions > of support for pluggable ControllerFactory-implementations. > I'm wondering what the status on this is. Will Maverick, at > some point, support user defined ControllerFactories? It > would seem natural, given the flexibility given for other > factory types within Maverick. Basically, I want to supply > a factory that asks a PicoContainer to get the controller > for me (without having to modify the Maverick source code). If you're volunteering to investigate the approach :-) Maverick evolves in an as-you-need-it kind of way. If you have a specific need, try to fit it into the framework - the code is very simple and easy to understand. I suggest kicking off the discussion by defining a set of requirements or maybe an interface or two that you would like to see satisified. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn [INVALID FOOTER] ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn [INVALID FOOTER]
