Hi,
it is build into release 7.6 (which is our current development release). 7.5.x or 
below will not change definition of volume size specification, to prevent migration 
problems... Migration from < 7.6 to >= 7.6 does automatically migrate volume size 
parameters.
CU
jrg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John L. Singleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sonntag, 7. M�rz 2004 00:26
> To: Mensing, Joerg
> Subject: Re: Formula for Maximum Volume Size on Raw Device
> 
> 
> Joerg,
> 
> Thanks for the information! Are there plans to make this 
> change in the 
> near future?
> 
> JLS
> 
> 
> 
> Mensing, Joerg wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >your formula is correct for now.
> >
> >SapDB_device_size = [ device_size_in_bytes / 8192 ] - 1 
> >
> >and we will announce as soon as we change it into the more 
> 'reasonable formula'
> >
> >SapDB_device_size = [ device_size_in_bytes / 8192 ]
> >
> >CU
> >jrg
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: John L. Singleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Freitag, 5. M�rz 2004 00:00
> >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >>Subject: Formula for Maximum Volume Size on Raw Device
> >>
> >>
> >>Hello again list,
> >>
> >>After a lot of dinking around, I've come up with (I hope) a 
> method to 
> >>determine the maximum size of a volume on a raw device.  
> >>Could someone perhaps verify this, or perhaps show me where 
> >>I've gone wrong?
> >>
> >>My raw device, as reported by blockdev is:
> >>
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] rhyce]# /sbin/blockdev --getsize /dev/raw/raw1
> >>40017852 (in 512 byte blocks)
> >>
> >>Now: The sector count isn't odd, meaning under Linux, the 
> last sector 
> >>should be usable as a raw device. If the number were, say, 
> >>40017852, I 
> >>would just subtract 1 first.
> >>
> >>40017852 * 512 = 20489140224 bytes
> >>
> >>Then:
> >>
> >>20489140224/8192 = 2501115 (which is the size in maxdb pages)
> >>
> >>And, since we need an extra 1k for header information:
> >>
> >>2501115 - 1 = 2501114
> >>
> >>Since 1024 bytes requires 1 additional page = 8192 bytes.
> >>
> >>This formula seems to work. Is there something I've missed?
> >>
> >>
> >>Ciao,
> >>JLS
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>MaxDB Discussion Mailing List
> >>For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb
> >>To unsubscribe:    
> >>http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >  
> >
> 

--
MaxDB Discussion Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to