Wiki is the popular choice, any provider or recommended hosted version? On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 12:30:43 PM UTC-4, Bruno CAPELETO wrote: > > > I use mediawiki for our internal technical documentation : all the > modifications/updates are tracable. > > > Le jeudi 25 février 2016 20:11:43 UTC+1, Roberto Rosario a écrit : >> >> My concern with a wiki is not being able to rollback changes or have a >> log of modifications. This is why I'm looking for a solution that allows >> collaborative editing with changes tracking, the closest I've found is a >> separate Git repository and edit the files using the simplest markup >> possible. >> On Feb 15, 2016 12:46 AM, "byT3b0N3" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think wiki would be the right place. >>> >>> Am Sonntag, 14. Februar 2016 05:00:06 UTC+1 schrieb Roberto Rosario: >>>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> >>>> I'm considering moving the documentation sources to their own separate >>>> Git repository and switch from RestructruredText to something simpler like >>>> Markdown. The idea is to reduce further the barrier for documentation >>>> submissions and help the documentation catch up to the features and >>>> capabilities of the software. >>>> >>>> Another idea is using an online service for collaborative writing and >>>> periodically synchronize the updates back to the existing Git >>>> documentation, same workflow as translations using Transifex. >>>> >>>> Comments, suggestions, ideas. >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Mayan EDMS" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>
-- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mayan EDMS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
