Gerard Gorman wrote: > Chandrashekhar P. Kaushik emailed the following on 05/08/08 19:20: >> Are you passing your dataset through a vtkDataSetSurfaceFilter ? >> I think that is what extracts the external surfaces properly using >> the level 1 ghost cells( this information from the SOURCE quaterly of Jul >> 2006). >> The SurfaceMap module of mayavi just seems to be passing the dataset to >> the vtkDataSetMapper. > > Thanks for your reply - I have a much better feel for for parallel is
Yes, thanks for the reply! > implemented in VTK now. Below is a patch for SurfaceMap.py. Similar Perhaps a brief description for the benefit of others may help (either here or off-list). Thanks. > patches will be need for many modules and filters. I'm guessing the same > is true for MV2. Yes. Note that there is not much sense in patching mayavi1.x at this point. I am not sure how adding this will affect mayavi2 for cases when there are no ghost cells etc. cheers, prabhu ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ MayaVi-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mayavi-users
