> Is this the post you are talking about: Nope, sorry, Bill sent it to the PMC mailing list instead:
b> [...] the sub-project b> structures need to be consistent, so I propose we continue with the httpd-foo b> CVS naming convention, reevaluate how effective the mod_proxy tree is for b> day to day use (I think it's close) and standardize... I'd suggest; b> b> httpd-foo/ b> site/ b> index.html sub-project home page b> module-1.3/ b> build/ b> docs/ b> mod_foo.html b> module-1.3/ b> mod_foo.sources b> module-2.0/ b> build/ b> docs/ b> mod_foo.html b> src/ b> mod_foo.sources We only have a 2.0 module, so this may be overkill. *shrug* ....Roy
