Hi, > I am still worried about the portability of client-side processing. > Between all the versions of all the browsers, doing complicated > things seems to be hit and miss to me.
So are we. As I said, only Gecko based browser can handle it, and I don't believe it's good to narrow the users range like this. > With an XSLT Cache, which mod_transform has, it can render very > quickly. I am a fan of Server-side processing for XSLT. Ok, I'll try to set up mod_transform with the XSLT Cache tonight on my local mod_mbox installation and see how all this stuff works. > We still need to make a decision as a group, do we want XSLT? > Do we want an alternative such as ClearSilver templates? > Do we just want 'better' HTML and CSS? According to me, XML+XSLT is the most evolutive solution. Except from the wanted AJAX stuff, we could also easily build advanced XUL applications on top of this XML output (just an idea, though). > I believe that since the work is already in progress for XSLT, that > makes it a good choice for now. The decision on server-side vs > client-side is interesting, and perhaps we can meet some middle > ground, but for now, I think we should pursue server-side > processing. /me's diving into server-side processing :) - Sam -- Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org) -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
